Investment, Banking & Finance

9

Wealth Management

9

Foreign Investment Law

Family & Personal Law

9

Family & Personal Status Law

9

Wealth Management

9

Management & Foreign Citizenship

Real Estate & Property Law

9

Real Estate Legal Services

9

Property Disputes

9

Construction & Infrastructure Law

Government Services

9

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)

9

Government Contracts (General Terms & Conditions)

9

Public Sector Procurement & Tendering

9

Letter of Award

Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, and Life Sciences

9

Healthcare & Pharmaceutical Law

9

Property Disputes

9

Medical Negligence

Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources Law

9

Energy, Oil & Gas Law

9

Environmental Law & Sustainability

SUBSCRIBE

8

Introduction

The Dubai Court of Cassation recently issued a significant ruling (Case No. 120/2025) addressing the enforceability of arbitration clauses in multi-party real estate disputes. This judgment provides valuable insights into how UAE courts approach arbitration agreements when some parties to a dispute were not signatories to the original arbitration clause.

 

Case Background

The case involves a real estate development dispute where the appellant challenged a lower court’s decision that rejected claims based on an arbitration clause. The property unit in question was registered in the Real Estate Registry on August 22, 2019, and the dispute arose regarding the completed property unit.

 

Key Legal Issues

1. Arbitration Clause Enforceability Against Non-Signatories

The Court affirmed the established principle that arbitration agreements bind only their signatories and cannot be extended to third parties who did not consent to arbitration. This principle is fundamental to UAE arbitration law, which respects the contractual nature of arbitration agreements.

 

 2. Multiple Parties in Real Estate Development Projects

The Court recognized that real estate development projects often involve multiple stakeholders with different legal standings. While acknowledging this reality, the Court emphasized that this multiplicity of parties does not automatically extend arbitration clauses to all involved parties.

 

 3. Indivisibility of Dispute Resolution

A notable aspect of the judgment is the Court’s discussion of the principle of indivisibility of dispute resolution. The Court held that the proper administration of justice requires avoiding fragmentation of disputes, especially when they relate to the same contract or project.

 

The Court’s Reasoning

real estate disputes dubai

The Court found that certain respondents (specifically the second through fourth respondents) were not parties to the arbitration agreement despite their involvement in the development project. While they had roles in receiving and distributing the unit price, they were not bound by the arbitration clause as they were not signatories to it.

The Court determined that forcing non-signatories into arbitration would contradict established legal principles regarding arbitration agreements, which are fundamentally consensual in nature.

 

Implied Acceptance and Limitation Period

An interesting aspect of this case involved the concept of implied acceptance. The Court noted that the appellant had remained silent for over five years after the completion of the unit and receipt of electronic notification on November 5, 2020, before filing the case. This prolonged silence was interpreted as implicit acceptance of the property’s condition and specifications.

 

Practical Implications for Real Estate Developers and Investors

This ruling has several practical implications:

  1. Careful Drafting of Arbitration Clauses: Parties involved in real estate development should ensure arbitration clauses clearly identify all potential parties who may be bound by them.
  2. Due Diligence on Contractual Relationships: Investors should understand the full contractual framework of a development, including which entities have agreed to arbitration and which have not.
  3. Consideration of Consolidation Provisions: To avoid fragmentation of disputes, parties should consider including provisions that allow for consolidation of related disputes.
  4. Timely Action on Claims: The court’s recognition of implied acceptance through prolonged silence emphasizes the importance of timely action when issues arise.

 

 Conclusion

The Dubai Court of Cassation’s judgment in Case No. 120/2025 reinforces the consensual nature of arbitration while navigating the complex realities of multi-party real estate development projects. It highlights the careful balance courts must strike between respecting arbitration agreements and ensuring access to justice for all parties involved in a dispute.

This case serves as a reminder of the importance of careful drafting and consideration of dispute resolution clauses, particularly in complex commercial arrangements involving multiple stakeholders.

*Disclaimer: our blogs, law updates, and FAQ’s are freely distributed for educational purposes and to showcase recent updates and regulations in the UAE’s framework.

If you have any questions and need assistance, contact us at our number or book an appointment online.

Dubai Court